The headline key result for each objective, so anyone can see progress without reading the tables. Update the values at every check-in.
Objective 1 headline KR
0
target 0
Objective 2 headline KR
0
target 0
Overall score
0.0
Objective 1
A qualitative, ambitious statement of direction: the "why," not a number.
Objective:
Key result
Baseline
Target
Current
Confidence
🟢/🟡/🔴
Initiatives:The concrete work expected to move these KRs. A KR with no initiative underneath it is a wish.
Objective 2
Objective:
Key result
Baseline
Target
Current
Confidence
Initiatives:
Scoring guidance
How to read a 0.7 vs. a 1.0. A 1.0 every time usually means the targets were sandbagged.
0.0-0.3: little to no progress
0.4-0.6: meaningful progress, fell short
0.7-1.0: hit or exceeded (ambitious targets should land around 0.7)
Check-in log
Date
Objective
Update
Questions
How many objectives should we have?
Two or three, each with two to four key results; more than that and nothing gets focus
What score counts as success?
About 0.7 on ambitious OKRs; a 1.0 every time means the targets were too easy
Is a key result a task?
No, it is a measurable outcome; tasks belong under initiatives
Fill it with your agent
Connect Claude to reph over MCP, then paste this. The draft arrives as suggestions you accept or reject section by section. How to connect Claude.
Find my reph doc "OKRs" with search_docs, then read it with read_doc. Draft objectives and key results from last period's OKR doc, the company strategy doc and the team plan linked in the doc; fill baselines from the dashboards I name and leave unset targets open. File it with suggest_edit, one replace_section op per section (heading line kept) so each can be accepted alone. Ask each open question (key results with no clear metric or owner) with add_comment quoting that section's heading line, then call request_review with a one-line summary.