reph

Templates · Education & classroom

Lab report template

A laboratory record: aim, apparatus, theory with equations, procedure, observations, calculations, result, error analysis and viva questions

Start with this template →Sign in

Opens on reph with the template ready to start. No account needed; sign in to keep your document.

Use it when

After a lab session, when your group writes up the experiment together from the readings you took on the bench

Who it's for

StudentEducator

Part of a kit

Final-year project, step 2 of 4. A team project from start to defence: the synopsis, lab reports along the way, the final report and preparing for the viva.

Filled example

The template filled in for a made-up company, so you can see what good looks like.

Basic Electrical Engineering Lab, Experiment 4: Time constant of an RC circuit

Course: EE 151 Basic Electrical Engineering Lab · Experiment: 4 · Author: Kavya Reddy · Date: 16 Oct 2026

Group Members Bench Instructor
B3 Kavya Reddy (23EE041), Rohan Das (23EE057), Sana Qureshi (23EE062) 7 Dr. P. Natarajan

Aim

To measure the time constant of a series RC circuit from its charging curve and compare it with the value \tau = RC from the component ratings.

Apparatus

Item Specification Quantity
Regulated DC supply 0 to 30 V, set to 5.00 V 1
Resistor 10 kΩ, 1% carbon film (measured 9.96 kΩ) 1
Electrolytic capacitor 470 µF, 25 V, tolerance 20% 1
Digital multimeter 20 V range, least count 0.01 V 1
Stopwatch Least count 0.01 s 1
SPDT switch, breadboard, leads 1 set

Theory

When a DC voltage V_0 is applied to an uncharged capacitor through a resistor, the capacitor voltage rises as

v_C(t) = V_0\left(1 - e^{-t/\tau}\right), \qquad \tau = RC

At t = \tau the capacitor reaches 1 - e^{-1} = 63.2\% of V_0. Rearranging and taking logs gives a straight line through the origin:

-\ln\left(1 - \frac{v_C}{V_0}\right) = \frac{t}{\tau}

so the slope of -\ln(1 - v_C/V_0) against t is 1/\tau. With the rated values, \tau = 10 \times 10^3 \times 470 \times 10^{-6} = 4.70 s.

Setup

Mermaid diagram (drawn as a picture in reph)
flowchart LR
    S["5 V DC supply"] --> SW["SPDT switch"]
    SW --> R["R = 10 kΩ"]
    R --> C["C = 470 µF"]
    C --> G["Ground"]
    C -.- M["Multimeter across C"]

Procedure

  1. Discharge the capacitor fully by shorting it through the switch's second position for 30 seconds.
  2. Connect the circuit as shown, with the multimeter across the capacitor on the 20 V range.
  3. Set the supply to 5.00 V and confirm it on the multimeter before connecting.
  4. Throw the switch to the supply and start the stopwatch at the same moment.
  5. Record the capacitor voltage at 2, 4, 6, 10 and 15 seconds, and the time at which it reads 3.16 V (63.2% of 5.00 V).
  6. Repeat steps 1 to 5 twice more and average the readings.

Precautions

  • Observe the capacitor's polarity. A reversed electrolytic capacitor can fail violently.
  • Discharge the capacitor fully before every run, or the curve starts above zero.
  • Keep the multimeter range fixed during a run so its input resistance stays the same.

Observations

Supply voltage V_0 = 5.00 V. Each voltage is the mean of three runs.

Time (s) v_C (V) 1 - v_C/V_0 -\ln(1 - v_C/V_0)
2 1.67 0.666 0.406
4 2.80 0.440 0.821
6 3.54 0.292 1.231
10 4.34 0.132 2.025
15 4.77 0.046 3.079

Time to reach 3.16 V: 4.88 s, 4.93 s and 4.90 s, mean 4.90 s.

Capacitor voltage while charging
Capacitor voltage while charging012345024610150 · volts: 02 · volts: 1.674 · volts: 2.86 · volts: 3.5410 · volts: 4.3415 · volts: 4.77
View data
secondsvolts
00
21.67
42.8
63.54
104.34
154.77

Calculations

Sample calculation for t = 10 s:

1 - \frac{4.34}{5.00} = 0.132, \qquad -\ln(0.132) = 2.025, \qquad \frac{t}{2.025} = \frac{10}{2.025} = 4.94 \text{ s}

A least-squares line through the origin over all five points gives the slope

m = \frac{\sum t_i y_i}{\sum t_i^2} = \frac{77.92}{381} = 0.2045 \text{ s}^{-1} \quad\Rightarrow\quad \tau = \frac{1}{m} = 4.89 \text{ s}

The direct 63.2% method gave 4.90 s, which agrees with the slope method to within 0.01 s.

Result

Measured time constant \tau = 4.89 \pm 0.10 s. Expected from the ratings: 4.70 s.

Error analysis

\text{Percentage error} = \frac{|4.89 - 4.70|}{4.70} \times 100 = 4.0\%
  • Capacitor tolerance (dominant). The capacitor is rated 470 µF with a 20% tolerance. With the measured resistance of 9.96 kΩ, our \tau implies C = 4.89 / 9960 = 491 µF, 4.5% above nominal and well inside the tolerance.
  • Reaction time. Starting and stopping the stopwatch by hand adds about 0.2 s per reading. Averaging three runs and fitting five points reduces its effect on \tau to about 0.1 s.
  • Meter loading. The multimeter's 10 MΩ input resistance is 1000 times R, so it changes \tau by about 0.1%, which is negligible.

Conclusion

The capacitor voltage followed the expected exponential curve, and the log plot was a straight line through the origin. The measured time constant of 4.89 s is 4.0% above the rated value, a difference explained by the capacitor's tolerance. The aim was met.

Viva questions

Why does the capacitor reach only 63.2% of the supply after one time constant?

Because 1 - e^{-1} = 0.632. The rate of charging is proportional to the remaining gap, so the voltage approaches V_0 exponentially and never quite reaches it.

How long until the capacitor is practically fully charged?

About 5\tau, roughly 24.5 s here, when it is within 0.7% of V_0.

What would doubling the resistance do?

It would double \tau, so the curve keeps the same shape but takes twice as long. The final voltage stays the same.

The template

Show the blank template

Lab report

Course: [course code and lab name] · Experiment: [number] · Author: [your name] · Date: [date]

Group Members Bench Instructor
[group] [names and roll numbers] [bench] [name]

Aim

One sentence: what you set out to measure or verify.

Apparatus

Every instrument and component, with its range, least count or rating.

Item Specification Quantity
[item] [range, least count or rating] [quantity]

Theory

The principle behind the experiment and the equation your result comes from, with every symbol defined.

[equation]

where [symbol] is [meaning, unit].

Setup

A circuit or setup diagram showing how the apparatus was connected.

Mermaid diagram (drawn as a picture in reph)
flowchart LR
    A["Source"] --> B["Component under test"]
    B --> C["Measuring instrument"]

Procedure

Numbered steps another student could follow to repeat the experiment.

  1. [step]
  2. [step]
  3. [step]

Precautions

What you did to avoid damage and keep the readings reliable.

  • [precaution]

Observations

Raw readings exactly as taken on the bench, with units in the column headers.

Reading [quantity, unit] [quantity, unit]
1
2
3

Calculations

One sample calculation in full, then the results for the rest of the readings.

[calculation]

Result

The measured value with its uncertainty and units, next to the expected value.

Error analysis

Each source of error, its likely size, and the percentage error against the expected value.

\text{Percentage error} = \frac{|\text{measured} - \text{expected}|}{\text{expected}} \times 100
  • [source of error and its effect]

Conclusion

What the result shows, and whether the aim was met.

Viva questions

Questions the examiner is likely to ask about this experiment, with short answers.

[question]

[answer]

Questions

Can the whole lab group write it together?
Yes. Everyone edits the same document live, and version history shows who saved each version
What goes in error analysis?
The size of each source of error, which one dominates, and whether your result agrees with the expected value within it
Should I include a graph?
Yes when the result comes from a slope or a curve. A chart block draws one from the numbers in your table

Fill it with your agent

Connect Claude to reph over MCP, then paste this. The draft arrives as suggestions you accept or reject section by section. How to connect Claude.

Find my reph doc "Lab report" with search_docs, then read it with read_doc. Draft the aim, theory, procedure, calculations and error analysis from the lab manual page and the readings I paste. Use only the readings I give you, never invent or round away a reading, and show each calculation with its formula. Write math as $...$ and $$...$$. File it with suggest_edit, one replace_section op per section (heading line kept) so each can be accepted alone. Ask each open question with add_comment quoting that section's heading line, then call request_review with a one-line summary.

Related templates

Start with this template →Sign in